Electronic Frontier Foundation
EFF is the leading civil liberties group defending
your rights in the digital world. » About Us
  • Home
  • About
  • Our Work
  • Deeplinks Blog
  • Press Room
  • Take Action
  • Shop
Home » Deeplinks Blog » July, 2005
  • Deeplinks Archives
    • October, 2011
    • September, 2011
    • August, 2011
    • July, 2011
    • June, 2011
    • May, 2011
    • April, 2011
    • March, 2011
    • More Archives
  • Blog Categories
    • Accessibility for the Reading Disabled
    • Analog Hole
    • Announcement
    • Anonymity
    • Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement
    • Bloggers' Rights
    • Broadcast Flag
    • Broadcasting Treaty
    • CALEA
    • Call To Action
    • CDA 230
    • Cell Tracking
    • Coders' Rights Project
    • Commentary
    • Copyright Trolls
    • Council of Europe
    • Criminalizing Content
    • Development Agenda
    • Digital Books
    • Digital Radio
    • Digital Rights Management
    • Digital Video
    • DMCA
    • DMCA Rulemaking
    • Do Not Track
    • E-Voting Rights
    • EFF Europe
    • EFF15
    • File Sharing
    • FOIA Litigation for Accountable Government
    • Free Speech
    • Free Trade Agreement of the Americas
    • Hollywood v. DVD
    • Innovation
    • Intellectual Property
    • International
    • International Privacy Standards
    • Legal Analysis
    • Legislative Analysis
    • Locational Privacy
    • Mandatory Data Retention
    • miniLinks
    • National Security Letters
    • Net Neutrality
    • News Roundup
    • News Update
    • No Downtime for Free Speech Campaign
    • NSA Spying
    • Online Behavioral Tracking
    • Patents
    • PATRIOT Act
    • Pen Trap
    • Printers
    • Privacy
    • Real ID
    • RFID
    • Search Engines
    • Search Incident to Arrest
    • Security
    • Social Networks
    • Technical Analysis
    • Terms Of (Ab)Use
    • Test Your ISP
    • The COICA Internet Censorship and Copyright Bill
    • The Global Network Initiative
    • Transparency
    • Travel Screening
    • Trusted Computing
    • Video Games
    • Wikileaks
    • WIPO
July 6th, 2005
Email This Digg This Post this to Reddit Share this blog post with delicious Share this on Facebook Tweet this blog post Dent this blog post

First Post-Grokster Cold Front?

Deeplink by Fred von Lohmann

As mentioned last week, the post-Grokster world may create new concerns for companies creating technologies that enable new digital uses like "place-shifting." Because these companies forthrightly promote activities that should qualify as fair uses, but have generally never been ruled on by a court, they are put in a potentially difficult position -- if they lose on fair use, are they automatically liable for inducement?

This is not just a hypothetical question. Apparently, the motion picture industry is turning its attention to "Me2Me" technologies like those offered by TiVo, Sling Media, and Orb Networks that allow you to access your own media via the Internet. The following quotes appeared in The Hollywood Reporter today:

  • "We're hopeful Slingbox will incorporate technology that will respect copyright," said Dean Garfield, vp and director of legal affairs at MPAA. "You don't have the authority to retransmit license work without negotiation or authorization."
  • "Slingbox is one manifestation of what we assume will be a cascade of similar products that are meant to manipulate our signals in ways that we think will be harmful to the network-affiliate business, if not the law," CBS executive vp Martin Franks said.
  • "Even if you take it at face value that it is a one-to-one transmittal device, I don't think it will be very long before some hacker in Cupertino posts on the Web the way to modify it, the way they modify a TiVo, that turns it into something that can be tapped by 50 people," Franks said.

Prior to the MGM v. Grokster ruling, these companies needed only to prove that any substantial use of their product is noninfringing. Today, they may be called upon to prove that every use that they ever promoted or advertised is noninfringing. Now there may be other defenses: courts should recognize that a good-faith belief that a use is noninfringing bars an inducement claim. But overall, this is one way MGM v. Grokster makes the climate chillier for innovators.

Related Issues: File Sharing

[Permalink]

Donate to EFF
Make a One-Time Contribution
Join EFF
Become a Member

Subscribe to EFFector

EFF's Newsletter and Action Alerts

Headlines

  • Victory for Reader Privacy
  • The Humble Frozen Synapse Bundle
  • Don't Let Privacy Law Get Stuck in 1986
  • Open Source Security
  • 2011 Pioneer Awards!

Projects

  • Bloggers' Rights
  • Coders' Rights
  • FOIA Project
  • Follow EFF
  • Patent Busting
  • Surveillance Self-Defense
  • Teaching Copyright
  • Takedown Hall of Shame
  • TOSBack
  • Ways To Help
Want to learn how you can defend free speech, stand up for privacy, fight for government transparency, support consumer rights, and protect your right to innovation in the digital world? Visit http://eff.org/fight to find ways to help.
Creative Commons Licensed
  • Thanks
  • RSS Feeds
  • Copyright Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact EFF