Electronic Frontier Foundation
EFF is the leading civil liberties group defending
your rights in the digital world. » About Us
  • Home
  • About
  • Our Work
  • Deeplinks Blog
  • Press Room
  • Take Action
  • Shop
Home » Deeplinks Blog » June, 2005
  • Deeplinks Archives
    • October, 2011
    • September, 2011
    • August, 2011
    • July, 2011
    • June, 2011
    • May, 2011
    • April, 2011
    • March, 2011
    • More Archives
  • Blog Categories
    • Accessibility for the Reading Disabled
    • Analog Hole
    • Announcement
    • Anonymity
    • Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement
    • Bloggers' Rights
    • Broadcast Flag
    • Broadcasting Treaty
    • CALEA
    • Call To Action
    • CDA 230
    • Cell Tracking
    • Coders' Rights Project
    • Commentary
    • Copyright Trolls
    • Council of Europe
    • Criminalizing Content
    • Development Agenda
    • Digital Books
    • Digital Radio
    • Digital Rights Management
    • Digital Video
    • DMCA
    • DMCA Rulemaking
    • Do Not Track
    • E-Voting Rights
    • EFF Europe
    • EFF15
    • File Sharing
    • FOIA Litigation for Accountable Government
    • Free Speech
    • Free Trade Agreement of the Americas
    • Hollywood v. DVD
    • Innovation
    • Intellectual Property
    • International
    • International Privacy Standards
    • Legal Analysis
    • Legislative Analysis
    • Locational Privacy
    • Mandatory Data Retention
    • miniLinks
    • National Security Letters
    • Net Neutrality
    • News Roundup
    • News Update
    • No Downtime for Free Speech Campaign
    • NSA Spying
    • Online Behavioral Tracking
    • Patents
    • PATRIOT Act
    • Pen Trap
    • Printers
    • Privacy
    • Real ID
    • RFID
    • Search Engines
    • Search Incident to Arrest
    • Security
    • Social Networks
    • Technical Analysis
    • Terms Of (Ab)Use
    • Test Your ISP
    • The COICA Internet Censorship and Copyright Bill
    • The Global Network Initiative
    • Transparency
    • Travel Screening
    • Trusted Computing
    • Video Games
    • Wikileaks
    • WIPO
June 28th, 2005
Email This Digg This Post this to Reddit Share this blog post with delicious Share this on Facebook Tweet this blog post Dent this blog post

Grokster = More Fair Use Cases?

Deeplink by Fred von Lohmann

One potential consequence of the MGM v. Grokster ruling may be an uptick in courts deciding fair use cases involving personal, noncommercial activities like "time-shifting" and "space-shifting."

A variety of new digital technologies are advertised and promoted for uses that the technology vendors believe to be fair uses. For example, Time Trax promotes its technology for recording satellite radio, Mercora for recording music from webcasts, and Sling Media for transmitting your TiVo'd TV shows to yourself over the Internet. All maintain that these personal, noncommercial, nontranformative uses of copyrighted works fall within the scope of fair use. No court, however, has ever weighed in on these (or virtually any other) personal digital fair uses.

If these innovators are wrong on the fair use score, however, are they all liable for inducement? To put it another way, the Supreme Court's ruling may put "fair use technology companies" in the position of having to litigate, and win, the fair use question on behalf of their customers in order to resist an inducement charge. That's an expensive burden to foist on these companies.

Notice that this is different from the situation that technology companies face when addressing contributory infringement claims. According to the Supreme Court in the Betamax case, it is enough if any use satisfies the "capable of substantial noninfringing uses" test (whatever that may mean).

So what happens if you are sued for inducement, and a court decides that your advertised use is not actually a fair use? Do statutory damages wipe out both the product and the company?

In other words, is it inducement if you reasonably, but incorrectly, believed that the use for which you promoted your product was covered by fair use (or any other copyright exception)? Hopefully the courts (or Congress) will find or fashion a safe harbor like this. But till then, like a Russian doll, a nested fair use case may be discovered in many an inducement case.

Related Issues: File Sharing

[Permalink]

Donate to EFF
Make a One-Time Contribution
Join EFF
Become a Member

Subscribe to EFFector

EFF's Newsletter and Action Alerts

Headlines

  • Victory for Reader Privacy
  • The Humble Frozen Synapse Bundle
  • Don't Let Privacy Law Get Stuck in 1986
  • Open Source Security
  • 2011 Pioneer Awards!

Projects

  • Bloggers' Rights
  • Coders' Rights
  • FOIA Project
  • Follow EFF
  • Patent Busting
  • Surveillance Self-Defense
  • Teaching Copyright
  • Takedown Hall of Shame
  • TOSBack
  • Ways To Help
Want to learn how you can defend free speech, stand up for privacy, fight for government transparency, support consumer rights, and protect your right to innovation in the digital world? Visit http://eff.org/fight to find ways to help.
Creative Commons Licensed
  • Thanks
  • RSS Feeds
  • Copyright Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact EFF